曾蔭權係一個電台節目度以特首身份進行國民教育, 點知靠佢通識零分既知識黎講普選就出事
Host :
I was struck by one phrase at the end of the policy address,
towards the end of the conclusion, you say, we promote democratic
development without compromising social stability or government
efficiency, that kind of implies that democratic development does
compromise social stability or government efficiency?
… … … … … … … … … … … …
Donald Tsang :
It
can, it can, if we go to the extreme, people go to the extreme, and you
have a cultural revolution, for instance, in China. When people take
everything into their hands, then you cannot govern the place.
… … … … … … … … … … … …
Host :
But Cultural Revolution wasn’t really an extreme example of democracy.
… … … … … … … … … … … …
Donald Tsang :
What
is it? People taking power into their own hands! Now, this is what it
means by democracy, if you take it to the full swing. In other
democracies, even if you have an elected person, then you overturn the
policy in California, for instance, you have initiative number, number,
number what, then you overturn policy taken by the government, that’s
not necessarily conducive to efficient government.
佢戇居到以為文革時真係人民當家作主, 毛澤東係人民選出黎, 唉, 所以大家唔好再發曾蔭權會幫香港人爭取真普選既綺夢, 佢最多都只係爭d 大陸假貨返黎當係普選。
若果要話民主走到極端, 我教你曾蔭權應該搵美國內戰黎做例子, 當年美國佬就奴隸制洲同洲之間講唔掂數, 結果由人民選出黎既洲政府就開戰, 哇, 民主攪到內戰, 你話極唔極端, 當時兩邊好多個洲都實行軍法管治, 仲有包庇暴行, 你話係唔係民主政府都可以好恐怖。奈何美國係極端民主之後就產生百年盛世, 可能佢連由狄娜主持既大國掘起都冇睇。
或者佢想講民主會拖慢政府效率同穩定, 講得太興奮而又冇理據所以求其亂up。
首先, 係南美好多國家係行左民主之後的確發生好多政府倒台同軍事政變, 問題係民主社會下既軍事政變, 係由一班有曾蔭權咁既思想既獨裁者推翻民主政權, 想用武力將人民既權力收返, 再加上同所謂既左仔一樣既民粹主義軍人支持, 而唔係民主會本身產生不穩。至於產生依班民粹主義既軍人同獨裁者同埋社會不隱, 正正就係好似而家大陸咁既貪污同貧富懸殊, 正好香港只係得貧富懸殊, 不過曾蔭權又冇興趣學麥理治改善, 吹咩。
至於效率麻, 你咪睇下世界列強點解係民主之下冇效率又可以發展得咁快, 學星加坡行獨裁? 人地外國投資者就係擔心李氏皇朝遲早會政局不穩, 所以星加坡每年俾外國大企業既稅務補貼仲多過教育經費先吸引到外國投資。要真正改善政府行政同施政效率, 不如先真正攪好個小政府吧, 盲目擴張官僚架構行政缺乏效率之餘當中增加既失誤, 咪令到政府更冇威信更難施政。
所以我點解一早都唔睇好曾蔭權, 而家大家明啦, 佢仲叻過葉劉, 係擦鞋方面。至於知識方面仲屎過葉劉未退休前, 好心佢學下葉劉讀多幾多書先返黎選啦。